Skip Nav

The Effect of Team Building on Performance

Navigation menu

❶Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: Members learn to know each other better, determine each other's areas of expertise and experience, and try to determine what types of behavior is acceptable within the group.

Teams & Team Building

3. Great Teams Need Non-work Communication
Team Building Resources
2. The 5 Best Team-Building Activities

Some conceptual and methodological refinements. Group and Organization Studies, 11, - Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: Academy of Management Journal, 29, - An empirical analysis of team building research. Group and Organization Studies, 6, - Does mental practice enhance performance?

Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, - Quasi-experimental confirmation among combat companies. The impact of organizational training laboratories upon effectiveness of ongoing work groups. Personnel Psychology, 20, - Task teams for rapid growth.

Harvard Business Review, 55, 71 - Google Scholar , ISI. Toward an effective open giant. Public Administration Review, 36, 46 - Group work as interventive modality with the older depressed client: Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 16, - A meta-analysis of self-help treatment approaches.

Clinical Psychology Review, 13, - The innovative rehabilitation team: An experiment in team building. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, - Foundations of team building: Introduction to the team building primer. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9, 1 - The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: Personnel Psychology, 39, - Organizational team building in church-related teams.

Operational size and member participation: Some empirical tests of alternative explanations. Human Relations, 18, - Organization development and change in organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, - The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: American Psychologist, 48, - Google Scholar , Crossref. Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, - Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis.

Small Group Research, 25, - Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, - The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: Psychological Bulletin, , - Salience, motivation, and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, - On the mathematics of committees, boards, and panels. Scientific Monthly, 63, 75 - Increasing productivity and morale in a municipality: Effects of organizational development.

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 59 - The impact of organization development. Academy of Management Review, 3, - Team building for nurses experiencing burnout and poor morale. In general, a group can be defined as a configuration of two or more interdependent individuals who interact over time. Groups work toward a common goal, are accountable to a manager, and may ideally accomplish their goals.

Leadership of a group is held by a single individual. However, groups do not have a clear, stable culture, so conflict is frequent. Teams, on the other hand, are a special type of group. In a team, there is a differentiation of skills where one individual does a specific part of the task and other individuals do other specific parts of the task. Another way teams are differentiated from groups is that the members of a team perform their work in the context of a common fate.

For example, although the members of the retail staff may help each other in the context of doing their jobs, they also all tend to do the same job. For the most part, dealing with one salesperson in a retail store should be the same as dealing with another person in the retail store. Further, members of a sales group typically do not share a common fate. For example, if Harvey does not do his job adequately, it will be Harvey -- and not the rest of the sales staff -- who will be reprimanded or fired.

On the other hand, some sales and marketing staffs are truly teams where there is differentiation of skill among the team members. For example, when trying to sell a learning management system for a computer-based training system, one member of the marketing team may specialize in comparing the business's system with that of the competition, while another team member might specialize in answering technical questions regarding the programmability of the system.

If the remuneration of the team members is based in part on commission for making the sale, then the fate of the individual members of the team depends on the fate of the team as a whole i. Leadership of a team is shared, and members are mutually accountable to each other. Because of these team characteristics, team members are committed to the goal and mission of the team, trust each other, and have a more collaborative culture than groups in general.

As a result, teamwork often leads to a situation of synergy Nahavandi, In manager-led teams, the design of the organizational context, the design of the team as a performing unit, and the monitoring and managing of the performance processes of the team is all a responsibility of the team manager.

In self-managing teams, the design of the organizational context in which the team works as well as the design of the group as a performing unit are both done by management. However, the self-managing team not only executes the task, but also monitors and manages the performance processes used in the performance of the task.

In a self-designing team, the organizational context in which the team operates is designed by management. However, all other aspects of the team functioning i. In self-governing teams, all aspects of the team -- including its design within the context of the organization -- are the responsibility of the team.

Although organizations sometimes act as though teams can be created by fiat, team development is in fact a multistage process Robbins, As illustrated in Figure 1, before a team is formed, it is a collection of individual entities.

Citation Tools

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Yet little of the research on team building had focused on communication. Suspecting it might be crucial, we decided to examine it more deeply. For our studies, we looked across a diverse set of industries to find workplaces that .

Privacy FAQs

This research reports the results of a comprehensive investigation into the effectiveness of team building. The article serves to update and extend Salas, Rozell, Mullen, and Driskell's () team-building meta-analysis by assessing a larger database and examining a broader set of outcomes.

About Our Ads

This cumulative research provides the strongest scientific evidence to date that team building can have measurable, positive effects on team performance. As you’ll soon see, the “secret” in making team building work is to keep things normal, and to avoid situations that feel invasive, awkward, or forced. This research reports the results of a comprehensive investigation into the effectiveness of team building. The article serves to update and extend Salas, Rozell, Mullen, and Driskell's (

Cookie Info

Start your hour free trial to unlock this page Teams & Team Building study guide and get instant access to the following: Research Paper Starter You'll also get access to more than 30, additional guides and , Homework Help questions answered by . Team building is an imperative aspect of any organization. The paper "Team Building" discusses the basis of team development as it has been able to showcase the true dynamics of its working within the recruitment down to the empowerment stages within the realms of an organization.