Knowing that, it is seemingly appropriate to say that one has the right to die an easy death if, and only if, he is terminally ill. Otherwise, different situations should not play any part in this issue. To understand more about the pro-euthanasia side of this issue, it is best conceived through the viewpoints, strong beliefs, and perspectives of proponents of euthanasia.
An individual has liberty, which includes the right of owning his life. He is the possessor of his life. Just as he can do whatever he wishes with his possessions, such as selling his new house, he can also wish to discontinue his life if the reasons were rational.
In a typical situation, a person has some terrible, deadly disease. He is trapped in a hospital bed, with all sorts of medical equipment connected to him, unable to move or do much of anything except exist. He is in terrible pain; he begs to have these machines disconnected so he can go home and live out whatever life he has left and die in peace.
He does not want to endure the pain, but instead, to assuage it. However, the doctors refuse because to turn off the machines would surely result in his death, and they have a presumed bias against doing this.
If a person decides that he wants to die, and someone does not think that this is a good decision, what right does the opposing person have to tell him that he cannot do this?
It is clear that a patient s decision to ask for a cessation in treatment, reflecting his own preference for death rather than for a continuation of discomfort or suffering, must be respected, barring exceptional circumstances Behnke Therefore, that individual s decision should be carried out because he has that right to his own personal decision, which is only one of many reasons why euthanasia should be legalized.
In addition, one should have the right to end his life by euthanasia because of the unsolicited pain, suffering, and misery he feels due to the disease he has or the condition he is in. People in this position would most likely want to alleviate their pain, suffering, and depression just to name a few partially because of the inconveniences, emotional and physical burdens, and drawbacks imposed on family members, relatives, and friends.
Furthermore, family members may be sensitive to the costs accumulating during terminal care Hagen Consequently, patients may feel guilty in this entire ordeal. Even more, people who, maybe because of a serious illness, are extremely depressed partly because they want to live their lives to the fullest by perhaps participating in energetic and active events but know that that is not possible now that they are severely ill and sick.
Since they recognize that enjoying life in those ways is no longer possible, they may want an easy way out euthanasia. Others simply do not want to sustain suffering. In considering suffering of terminal patients, one cannot exclude from thought the grief due to distress, fear, and agony. Nor must anyone underestimate the bearable level of pain in the periods between doses of medication or simply from being turned over in bed. There is still too little known about what is actually experienced by patients as they approach death so it is evident that the individual, and only the individual, has the right to choose when he wants to die.
These factors, along with unwanted suffering, pain, and misery are only some of the components considered in allowing the act of euthanasia. The final element worthy of discussion in legalizing euthanasia is an individual s frustration in living, in his opinion, a valueless life after becoming critically ill. People who suffer from illnesses that make them unable to communicate do not want to live any longer.
This includes people who are in a coma, are paralyzed, or simply so sick and weak that they cannot make meaningful sounds or other communication. If the person is no longer able to relate in any way to his relatives and friends, he might not want to live a day further Bender In addition to that, some people believe that their quality of life is so low that they would rather die.
If this is the case, then what position do others have to go against this? No one other than the patient has any right to deny the patient his way of dying.
Therefore, euthanasia should and must be a legal choice. Like any other issue, there are opposing viewpoints regarding the legalization of euthanasia. Pro-lifers, people who are against euthanasia, place the emphasis on killing. They believe that we are merely stewards of our lives; it is for God to decide when our lives are to end. Further, suffering, is an inevitable part of life; our task is to understand and grow from suffering, not evade it Mabie Pro-euthanasia people, who place the emphasis on mercy, argue that stewardship has not prevented the religious from exercising control in other areas of their lives for example, in using analgesics for surgery and childbirth.
If it is for God to decide when life will end, if suffering is ennobling, then the very practice of medicine is and always has been wrong. Further, they hold that theological arguments against euthanasia pertain only to the religious; the constitutional separation of church and state requires that opposition to euthanasia on theological grounds alone not be codified in law Mabie Patients have the right to given alternatives to euthanasia and time to evaluate them before making informed consent.
There are many legal procedures that pertain to euthanasia and sometimes patients enter a legal agreement with the hospital administration to consider euthanasia in case they are in incurable and terminal conditions.
The patient must sign a legal agreement to confirm that they have agreed to choose euthanasia Smith, As a result, doctors have full medical record of the patient that can guarantee that the doctor has done thorough diagnosis to prescribe euthanasia to the patient. In addition, hospitals have technology facilities that ensure accurate data is before choosing euthanasia Paterson, Moreover, euthanasia on patients who provide the consent to the doctors before they proceed to terminate their lives.
In both situations, euthanasia is applicable with or without the consent of the patient; as a result, this justifies the right to euthanize patients.
See sample definition essays here. The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: You must be logged in to post a comment. Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Example. Home Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Example. That the patient can be making the decision under his or her conscience or consent. Such a definition of euthanasia is unclear.
In a broader sense, such a definition applies only to the voluntary euthanasia. The prospect of ever suffering from dementia can be enough reason to choose euthanasia. Patients continue to suffer a life of unbearable pain with no sign of improvement. Instead of suffering, I suit to be more appropriate if the patient to choose euthanasia. Moreover, euthanasia is appropriate for patients who are terminally ill and cannot recover.
Pro-Euthanasia essays Should a person who is terminally ill, who feels that their life is not worth living due to intolerable pain and/or loss of dignity and/or loss of capability, who repeatedly asks for help in committing suicide, and who is of sound mind and not suffering from depression be give.
Free sample essay on why euthanasia should be legalised. Get help with writing an essay on euthanasia topic. Pro euthanasia arguments essay example. Research paper on legalizing euthanasia.
Essay Pro Euthanasia Words | 3 Pages. Pro Euthanasia Most people want to live their life with dignity and die with dignity. People make important choices and decisions through out their life. Essay 1: Euthanasia In the essay, The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia, J. Gay-Williams states that euthanasia is inherently and morally wrong. He further argues that euthanasia is the intentional and deliberate act of taking a person’s life.
Do you wonder what 'euthanasia' means when your teacher asks you to write essays on euthanasia? Learn how to write such paper using the best ideas and structure the supporting argument. Every argument should be supported by the evidence found during the research. Begin with the pro-euthanasia arguments. still your essay must have an. The free Euthanasia research paper (Why Should Euthanasia Be Legalized? essay) presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing service. To understand more about the pro-euthanasia side of this issue, it is best conceived through the viewpoints, strong beliefs, and perspectives of proponents of euthanasia.