If a cure for a condition is discovered, the animal reaps the benefits of the cure as well. Through animal testing, drugs have been developed to treat human and veterinary ailments. Using animals in research is a costly methodology.
Often it is not even possible without the companies or organizations asking for outside funding from third parties. The costs of feeding, housing, caring for, and treating the animals must be considered, as well as the price of the animals in the first place.
Certain companies breed animals solely for this purpose. Additionally, the animals used in the experiments are in captivity, and may be harmed or killed.
The substance being tested may well prove to be lethal for the animals, or the conditions during their captivity may lead to their deaths. On top of that, some of the tests may never render any useful information at all, and therefore animal lives are sacrificed in vain, and no human benefit was derived.
Before the passage of the AWA, the only laws constraining animal use in society forbade the purposeless, deviant, or even sadistic infliction of pain or suffering onto animals. One argument that is considered seriously is that animals cannot provide consent to the testing to which they are being subjected.
Above all, though, is that the testing certainly can and often does involve the pain and suffering of the animals. When possible, researchers claim to take measures to prevent or minimize suffering, but there are times when providing, say, an anesthetic will change the interaction of the drug being tested.
Organizations such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals PETA have placed the opposition to animal research more clearly before the eyes of the public. In order to do so, they have publicized a number of animal tests that were urgently distasteful to the public, even if they were not examples of the norm in research:. A mouse may react positively to a treatment while a bird may have a negative reaction. These types of treatments are often put on the back burner.
Animal testing provides quite a few benefits to the human race. Countless medical treatments have been developed through the use of animal testing. The biggest problems are the ethical ones, which need to be individually addressed rather than animal testing as a whole.
Pros of Animal Testing To decide whether animal testing is beneficial or not, it is best that you start learning its positive sides first like the following: Is Animal Testing Necessary? The Pros and Cons. Rats share certain similarities with the human biology. Their hard luck, it seems. This has made them one of the most used animals in experiments and laboratory testing. Consequently, numerous tests on animals have led to path breaking discoveries in medical science. On the contrary, animal research ethics and the integrity and morality of such tests have been questioned by environmentalists.
However, when we view various animal testing pros, we realize that there are several positive aspects to it as well. Various dangerous diseases like herpes simplex, hepatitis B, polio, rabies, malaria, and mumps have been treated owing to medications developed from tests on animals. Results through medical research on animals have led to improvement in medical procedures like blood measurement, lung disease diagnosis, heart disease diagnosis, and various pacemaker technologies.
One of the most important techniques in medical surgery, anesthesia, has been developed after it has been tested on animals. Animal research has also been able to benefit cats and dogs in certain ailments. Moreover, the nutrition of cats and dogs has been improved after repeated animal tests.
Cons Animal testing statistics are alarming. To discover new medicines and vaccinations, millions of animals are killed every year all across the globe. Animal rights are lost in oblivion when it comes to animal testing ethics. In this part, we focus on the demerits. Animals go through severe pain during the tests. Most testers claim they use anesthesia to conduct the tests. However, can pricking needles and using chemicals on animals be painless?
Who knows if they use anesthesia safely. Just because animals can't speak, it is not morally correct to subject them to such treatments. Months of torture leads to loss of eyesight, organ failure, and many more dangerous consequences on the animals' health.
Just to see the effects of chemicals, animals are imprisoned and observed over a certain period of time. Meanwhile, they go through hell and eventually die.
Animal research is highly regulated, with laws in place to protect animals from mistreatment. In addition to local and state laws and guidelines, animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) since
Pros of Animal Research To begin, research using animals may lead to new medications being discovered. Examples of medications that have been the result of animal testing are Penicillin, several asthma treatments, cancer and HIV drugs, vaccines, antibiotics, and insulin.
Pros of Animal Testing. To decide whether animal testing is beneficial or not, it is best that you start learning its positive sides first like the following: Treatments Developed Have Saved Lives Animals are the most common subject of medical testing. This includes new drugs as well as possible cures for many different medical problems. While there are numerous pros and cons of animal testing, the ethical aspect overshadows both of them, which means that emotion may be the ultimate determining factor in whether a person believes the benefits of animal testing outweigh the problems associated with the practice.
The pros and cons of animal research will always be controversial. Testing animals to see if a product is safe may be better than testing humans first, but that also means the life of an animal is devalued. On the contrary, animal research ethics and the integrity and morality of such tests have been questioned by environmentalists. Pros PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) supporters will stand in unison against the support of animal testing.