Signal refutations with transition words such as "but," "however," or "although. Synthesize the information to leave a lasting impression on the reader. Link the last paragraph to the introduction and reiterate a key word or phrase used in the beginning. Conclude with a quotation from a primary reference, redefine a key term, or set your argument in a larger context by demonstrating how your paper falls within a larger area of concern or by posing further questions.
Nicole Newman is a Dartmouth College associate who works in Tiltfactor Laboratory, Dartmouth's premier game design center. Her research has included investigating the digital humanities through "Writing as a Dimensional Artifact" and "Evolution of the Ghetto: How to Write a Controversial Essay.
How to Write an Opposing Viewpoint Essay. Accessed 14 September Depending on which text editor you're pasting into, you might have to add the italics to the site name. Warnings Proofread carefully for grammar and spelling errors. Double-check your source information and documentation. D in comparative literature from the University of California at Berkeley.
If the author has earned her a Ph. D in comparative literature that gives her credibility because she has had to go through a lot of years of schooling and she has a lot of writing experience by now after getting a job in the field. Steven Johnson used ethos the best in his argument.
In the beginning he is introduced as: The Natural History of Innovation Johnson is also a contributing editor for Wired, writers a monthly column for Discover, and teachers journalism at New York University. He is the author of seven other books and list them all. It then goes on to say Johnson is a contributing editor for Wired, he writers a monthly column for Discover, and teachers journalism at New York University.
All of these things about Johnson give him a lot of credibility to begin with. Pathos has to do with appealing to your audiences emotion. Using imaginative impact, and stories can convince your audience of your argument by creating an emotional response. Tone is also a huge part of pathos, the way you state your argument can have a impact on their opinion.
Dana Stevens wants to expose Steven Johnsons article and she does so by using pathos to get to the audiences emotions. The mention of endorsement of torture usually makes people feel very disgusted and upset because of their morals. Steven Johnson uses pathos to get in touch with the audiences feelings by using TV shows that go against any normal persons morals. He used shows that brought up a lot of public controversies.
The episode that was shown on the twenty-fourth only fanned the flames higher: It will also really get people into their emotions too. Something that is out of the norm like that will also get into peoples emotions. Craig also refers to studies that prove vegetarians have one-half the risk of cancer and have a percent lower risk of overall mortality.
This information triples as a logos, pathos, and ethos appeal. Another devise they both use to strengthen their stance is pathos. The authors use this device to attract the readers emotions. Kim brings up the cruel treatment of animals raised for food. It is understandable that he was trying to get the readers emotions going here, but honestly it is quite off topic. His point was to inform his audience how vegetarianism is actually not the healthiest choice.
He brings up another point that the long term affects are what you have to watch out for. The topic of cancer always pulls on heart strings. Just about everyone knows someone that has been affected by cancer. Both authors mention some information that they know will get an emotion response out of their audience. While both authors discuss the same topic, their valid viewpoints differ. In the end, Craig more successfully convinced his readers to take his side on this issue.
His hard facts and his credibility by far outshines that of Kim. All in all, Craig did an excellent job developing his strongly focused opinion through the use of pathos, logos, and ethos. Opposing Viewpoints in Context.
- Three Opposing Viewpoints on Abortion Abortion has been an issue of heated debate in the United States for numerous years. Legislation has ruled it legal to perform an abortion on any gestational age .
Opposing Viewpoints essays"The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is by hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind.
Opposing Viewpoints Essay Madison Martin CORE 10/14/14 Opposing Viewpoints Essay Everyone has their own opinion The person sitting next to you can have an entirely different outlook . An opposing viewpoint essay calls for a student to investigate a topic and evaluate the evidence supporting one side of an argument. This type of essay calls for extensive research of literature and, at times, empirical research through surveys and interviews.
Mar 15, · subject from the Opposing Viewpoints in Context from the university library. Make sure you obtain articles that cover both sides or points of view on the subject (one should be for it and the . When it comes to viewpoints there will always be an opposing side. You must develop your strongly focused opinion with examples and/or reasons. In order for a reader to accept your side you must use clear, powerful, and direct language to really capture them.